<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mobile Perspectives &#187; iTunes Connect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.BluMtnWerx.com/blog/tag/itunes-connect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.BluMtnWerx.com/blog</link>
	<description>Computing at the Edge!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:29:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Some iTunes Connect Mysteries</title>
		<link>http://www.BluMtnWerx.com/blog/2009/09/some-itunes-connect-mysteries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.BluMtnWerx.com/blog/2009/09/some-itunes-connect-mysteries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 23:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[App Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes Connect]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.BluMtnWerx.com/blog/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've been wondering about iTunes Connect recently.&#160;  Some parts of the app submission process really puzzle me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I submitted both paid and trial versions of a new app yesterday.&nbsp;  As I struggled with the iTunes Connect interface, I started wondering why some parts of it couldn&#8217;t be just a <em>little bit</em> easier.&nbsp;  This post is pure venting, as I&#8217;m pretty frustrated.&nbsp;  It shouldn&#8217;t be this hard to help Apple build their business.&nbsp;  And, &#8220;NO,&#8221; <a href="http://www.blumtnwerx.com/blog/2009/08/unexpected-additional-time-for-review-hunh/" title="Mobile Perspectives:  unexpected additional time for review - Hunh?">iPuckLite</a> has not yet been approved, even though it&#8217;s been in the queue for more than four weeks.</p>
<p>First of all, let&#8217;s consider generating screenshots.&nbsp;  The images produced when we capture shots with the &#8220;Screenshot&#8221; facility in the Xcode Organizer are in Portable Network Graphics format (.png).&nbsp;  Unfortunately, the submission process explicitly stipulates that screenshots are to be:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>High quality JPEG or TIFF image file format. PNG images are not acceptable.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Of course, it&#8217;s easy to convert to the proper format, but why make us do this step five times, every time we submit an application?</p>
<p>Second, if iTunes Connect specifically prohibits PNG images, why does it allow us to upload them?&nbsp;  The submission form will reject images that aren&#8217;t properly sized for the screenshots (320&#215;460 / 320&#215;480 portrait; 480&#215;300 / 480&#215;320 landscape), but it doesn&#8217;t seem to validate the format when uploading the &#8220;large&#8221; icon (which has an identical restriction on image format).&nbsp;  I was hurrying yesterday, and I inadvertently uploaded the PNG version of my 512x icon for one of the apps.&nbsp;  iTunes Connect happily accepted the incorrect format, and allowed me to upload it.&nbsp;  When I realized my mistake, and tried to upload the correct JPEG version of the file, iTunes Connect crashed.</p>
<p>Which brings me to reliability.&nbsp;  Over the course of submitting two applications, iTunes Connect crashed three times.&nbsp;  Each time, I had to log back in to start the process over &mdash; of course it lost all of the information that I&#8217;d submitted prior to each crash.&nbsp;  I guess that we&#8217;re all used to this, now, so we keep all of our submission information in a separate file and just copy it into the appropriate fields of the form.&nbsp;  I&#8217;m not even counting the time that I couldn&#8217;t log back in because my session &#8220;could not connect to application instance.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another thing that strikes me as odd.&nbsp;  Some of the fields, specifically, &#8220;Application Description&#8221; and &#8220;Keywords&#8221; have strictly enforced character count limits (4K for the former &#8211; even though the form suggests 700; 100 for the latter).&nbsp;  Unfortunately, there are no visible counters to tell us how many characters the field thinks that we&#8217;ve entered.&nbsp;  We don&#8217;t find out that we have exceeded their limit until we try to submit the form.&nbsp;  I use <a href="http://www.barebones.com/products/textwrangler/" title="Bare Bones Software:  TextWrangler page">TextWrangler</a>, which has a handy &#8220;info&#8221; function that provides character, word, line and page counts for a document, or a selected region.&nbsp;  Sadly, especially for the description field, the character count shown by TextWrangler disagrees with the internal count that iTunes Connect is using.&nbsp;  I generally have to have less than 3900 characters, according to TextWrangler, to avoid rejection for exceeding the form&#8217;s 4000 character limit.&nbsp;  BTW, It appears that spaces count against your total for Keywords, so perhaps I&#8217;ll eliminate the spaces from future submissions &mdash; &#8220;keywd1, keywd2&#8243; will become &#8220;kewd1,keywd2&#8243;.&nbsp;  I wonder if that will work.</p>
<p>With all of the outstanding support that Apple provides to developers (the best documentation, a quite good IDE, wonderful SDK&#8217;s&hellip;), I can&#8217;t help but wish that they would put just a tiny bit more effort into the app submission process.&nbsp;  On the other hand, <a href="http://148apps.biz/" title="148Apps.biz site">148Apps.biz</a> is <a href="http://148apps.biz/app-store-metrics/" title="148Apps.biz: App Store Metrics">currently reporting</a> that there are 18,639 active publishers supporting the App Store, so perhaps Apple just figures that we&#8217;ll tolerate whatever they put in front of us.&nbsp;  And, of course, we will.</p>
<p>&nbsp;  </p>
<hr .../>
Technorati Tags:&nbsp; <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/iPhone" rel="tag">iPhone</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/iPod+Touch" rel="tag">iPod Touch</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Apple" rel="tag">Apple</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/mobile" rel="tag">mobile</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/iTunes+Connect" rel="tag">iTunes Connect</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/App+Store+Approval" rel="tag">App Store Approval</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.BluMtnWerx.com/blog/2009/09/some-itunes-connect-mysteries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

