<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mobile Perspectives &#187; iPad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.BluMtnWerx.com/blog/tag/ipad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.BluMtnWerx.com/blog</link>
	<description>Computing at the Edge!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:43:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>iPad CPU Rumors &#8211; #fail?</title>
		<link>http://www.BluMtnWerx.com/blog/2010/03/ipad-cpu-rumors-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.BluMtnWerx.com/blog/2010/03/ipad-cpu-rumors-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 02:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cortex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.BluMtnWerx.com/blog/?p=918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I try not to believe anything that I read about pre-launch Apple products, there's been a fair bit of speculation regarding the device's processor.&#160;  I've even, perhaps rashly, quoted some of the details in various discussions.&#160;  Was it all just breathless fanboi excitement?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should know better than to ever accept anything written, or stated, about pre-launch Apple products.&nbsp;  Unfortunately, I was so excited about the iPad CPU that I ill-advisedly went ahead and talked about it during various conversations and planning sessions.&nbsp;  Thankfully, I didn&#8217;t write anything about the wonderful new part.&nbsp;  Fortunately, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/apples-a4-is-an-arm-based-system-on-a-chip-a-la-tegra-2/" title="Engadget:  Apple's A4 chip is ARM Cortex A9 with an ARM Mali GPU?" target="_blank">Engadget did</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em><span style="color:#0505D0">&#8220;&hellip;we&#8217;re hearing that it is in fact a system-on-a-chip driven by a Cortex-A9 MPCore CPU &#8220;identical&#8221; to the one found inside NVIDIA&#8217;s Tegra 2, while besting the iPhone 3GS significantly with its 1GHz speed and multicore architecture.&nbsp;  The A4 is composed of that Cortex barnburner, an integrated memory controller, and the Mali GPU, making it an all ARM affair&hellip;&#8221;</span></em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/" title="Engadget site" target="_blank">Engadget</a> was even so kind as to publish a &#8220;photo:&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/apples-a4-is-an-arm-based-system-on-a-chip-a-la-tegra-2/" title="Engadget:  Apple's A4 chip is ARM Cortex A9 with an ARM Mali GPU?" target="_blank"><img style="vertical-align:center; float: center; margin: 0.5em; width: 300px;" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/28jan10owub453.jpg" alt="Engadget:  A4 Image" title="Engadget provides a picture of the A4 package"/></a></p>
<p>Lovely.</p>
<p>And then, today, <a href="http://arstechnica.com/" title="Ars Technica site" target="_blank">Ars Technica</a> tries to bring the whole dream <a href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/2010/02/meet-the-a4-the-ipads-brain.ars" title="Ars Technica:  The A4 and the A8: secrets of the iPad's brain" target="_blank">crashing down</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em><span style="color:#0505D0">&#8220;&hellip;it turns out that the the A4 is a 1GHz custom SoC with a single Cortex A8 core and a PowerVR SGX GPU.&nbsp;  The fact that A4 uses a single A8 core hasn&#8217;t been made public, but I&#8217;ve heard from multiple sources who are certain for different reasons that this is indeed the case.&nbsp;  (I wish I could be more specific, but I can&#8217;t.)</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="color:#0505D0">In all, the A4 is quite comparable to the other Cortex A8-based SoCs that are coming onto the market, except that the A4 has even less hardware.&nbsp;  The iPad doesn&#8217;t have much in the way of I/O, so the A4 itself can do away with the I/O that it doesn&#8217;t need.&nbsp;  In contrast, the typical Cortex A8-based SoC has more I/O hardware than a mobile phone can use, because you never know what customers will need which interface types.&#8221;</span></em></p></blockquote>
<p>Now I grew up in the days when real men had big block V8&#8217;s in their cars, so I was excited by the original rumors.&nbsp;  On the other hand, the Ars Technica post makes a lot of sense &mdash; cram a simpler CPU in, jack the clock rate and let the software do its stuff.&nbsp;  In many circles, that&#8217;s just plain old good system design.</p>
<p><img style="vertical-align:center; float: center; margin: 0.5em; width: 570px;" src="http://www.seriouswheels.com/pics-1970-1979/1970-Dodge-Challenger-Lime-Green-fa-c-ma.jpg" alt="Serious Wheels:  1970 Dodge Challenger image" title="Serious Wheels:  1970 Dodge Challenger - Lime Green"/></p>
<p align="right"><em>Image Credit:&nbsp;  <a href="http://www.seriouswheels.com/1970-1979/1970-Dodge-Challenger-Lime-Green-FA.htm" title="Serious Wheels:  1970 Dodge Challenger - Lime Green" target="_blank">Serious Wheels</a></em></p>
<p>&nbsp;  </p>
<hr .../>
Technorati Tags:&nbsp;  <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/iPad" rel="tag">iPad</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/iPod+Touch" rel="tag">iPod Touch</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Apple" rel="tag">Apple</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/mobile" rel="tag">mobile</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/A4" rel="tag">A4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.BluMtnWerx.com/blog/2010/03/ipad-cpu-rumors-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
